Hot-dipped Galvanizing vs. Epoxy Coating

Sep. 09, 2024

Hot-dipped Galvanizing vs. Epoxy Coating

With competitive price and timely delivery, YUANXIAN sincerely hope to be your supplier and partner.

There was a time when epoxy coating was a common option to treat and protect steel before using it in construction projects. But with every passing year, hot-dipped galvanizing proves to be the better option. This is for a few reasons. Steel and concrete both accept the resulting zinc coating produced by galvanizing better than they accept epoxy. This happier chemical relationship saves money and time throughout the project&#;s lifespan.

In the hot-dipped galvanizing vs epoxy coating competition, we are certain galvanizing is the clear winner. We are so confident in hot-dipped galvanizing&#;s results, we offer the service ourselves. Here&#;s why we think galvanizing your steel is better than using an epoxy coating.

Hot-Dipped Galvanizing vs Epoxy Coating: Know the Differences and Why They&#;re Important

When comparing hot-dipped galvanizing and epoxy coating, there are several major differences to consider.

Hot-dip galvanizing involves creating a protective coating around fabricated steel by dipping it in a vat of molten zinc, then allowing the zinc to bond with the steel as it cools. By comparison, an epoxy coating is typically sprayed onto the surface of the steel. This creates a protective film that sits on top of the steel but does not form a chemical bond with it.

These two treatments offer very different results, some of which are better suited to different construction projects. Galvanized steel coatings are a silver-gray color that can appear matte or shiny if treated and polished the right way. Epoxy coatings look plastic and can be different colors, like gray or green.

The upfront costs of galvanized materials can be higher, which can make some builders and designers reconsider using them. But, as we&#;ll explain more in the next section, the strengths of galvanized materials mean less cost in the long run.

The epoxy coating may be a good option for small or residential projects where it will stand alone and not be installed inside concrete. But for commercial builds and projects that need steel to support the structure, hot dip galvanizing is the better choice.

Is Hot-Dipped Galvanizing Better? Why We Think So

In our opinion at South Atlantic, the winner of hot-dipped galvanizing vs epoxy coating is galvanizing every time. We stand behind hot-dipped galvanizing because it creates more resilient materials that can withstand harsh conditions and minimize extra costs during the build and afterward.

The hot-dip galvanizing process creates a zinc coating that bonds to the steel and actually continues to protect it from corrosion. It does this through its unique self-healing properties, which are able to strengthen and repair scratched areas on the coating&#;s surface when they come into contact with water.

This makes galvanized materials more durable for transportation and infrastructure. After hot-dipped galvanizing, the steel itself is strengthened because of the coating. This also helps it handle harsh weather and temperatures better than steel with epoxy coatings.

Instead of waiting for the perfect weather conditions or for new materials to replace the compromised ones, a project that uses galvanized steel can stay on budget and on schedule . This super-power coating is also a perfect partner for concrete. When galvanized materials are in contact with concrete, they form a mutually beneficial bond as the zinc from the coating enters the concrete itself. This strengthens the concrete around the materials while also creating an extra layer of protection for the steel.

This saves money during the build by reducing how much overlap space is needed to build a secure frame for larger projects. It also significantly cuts down repair and maintenance costs for the long term, as the coating on galvanized materials can maintain like-new thickness for decades.

How Long Does hot-dipped Galvanizing Last? Plus, How It Beats the Odds

The question, &#;how long does hot-dipped galvanizing last?&#; is a hard one to answer for a good reason: galvanized materials keep outlasting the projects that use them. Time and time again steel that has been hot-dip galvanized is shown to maintain its thickness and durability 40, 50, and even 60+ years after its initial installation. These successes led to hot-dipped galvanizing and its materials earning a reputation for having a &#;100-year lifespan.&#; While there are many examples to prove this, here are a few we&#;ve covered on the blog:

In the first example, the New York State Thruway Authority tried to use epoxy-coated rebar during the first round of repairs on their roadways. But the coatings cracked so soon, the roads were left in disrepair again in a short time. They decided to experiment with using galvanized rebar instead to fix one of the bridges.

The results were so impressive, they used galvanized materials for the remainder of the repairs and continue to use them in projects today. So, we&#;re not the only ones who think the winner of hot-dipped galvanizing vs epoxy coating is clear.

Hot-dipped galvanizing creates materials that last because the zinc coating continues repairing itself. When the galvanized materials are placed within concrete, the zinc immediately gets to work moving into it, merging particles to form a stronger bond.

Then if anything does cause the coating to scratch, the zinc works on healing and protecting itself when water tries to get in and cause corrosion. Using galvanized materials is like installing a repair crew within the steel itself: it works that well.

Looking for Superior Building Materials? At South Atlantic, We&#;ve Got You Covered

Hot-dipped galvanizing is the best way to protect your steel materials, keep your project on schedule, and save costs without compromising. We are proud to hot-dip galvanize materials that we purchase directly from American mills to fit your needs. With over 50 years of experience, we have the knowledge and skills to be the only supplier you&#;ll need to call for your construction and infrastructure projects.

Fill out our contact form here to get started: southatlanticllc.com/galvanizing/contact.

Corrosion Experimental Research on Local Damage of ...

Epoxy coating has been proven to protect steel bars from corrosion. However, the damage of epoxy coating is inevitable, and this may lead to more serious corrosion of steel bar. In order to study the corrosion resistance of steel bars with damaged epoxy coating, two groups of coating-damaged bar and one group of coating-intact rebar were designed, and six specimens were made. The influence of electrolyte concentration on the corrosion rate of steel bars was studied by setting different concentrations. After 30 days of accelerated corrosion, electrochemical data were recorded by the electrochemical workstation. The experimental result shows that the steel bars with coating damage have obvious polarization curve characteristics of corrosion, and corrosion resistance decreases obviously. According to the corrosion current and potential, the larger the damaged area of the coating, the faster will be the corrosion rate. According to the polarization curve data, the polarization resistance is modified, and the result is closer to the real polarization resistance value. The calculated corrosion rate shows that the corrosion rate of reinforcement is affected by both electrolyte concentration and coating damage area, and electrolyte concentration has a greater influence on the corrosion rate.

Introduction

As the bridge is gradually extended to the deep sea, the bridge not only needs to bear more complex loads but also will meet more severe durability problems of concrete structures. The mechanical failure of the concrete structure usually begins with material failure. For deepwater structures, corrosion, crack, breakage, and other problems of basic materials will lead to attenuation of structural resistance and affect the long-term bearing capacity, service safety, and reliability of the structure.

Additional measures on existing structures can reduce the probability of corrosion, such as coating concrete surfaces, corrosion inhibitors, electrochemical dechlorination, cathodic protection, high corrosion-resistant steel materials, and various coated steel bars. Because of its convenience, reinforcement-protective coating has been used in engineering (Stratmann et al., ; Grundmeier et al., ). In order to study the effectiveness of epoxy-coated steel bars, many corrosion experiments and investigations had been carried out (Atilgan et al., ; Clear et al., ; Smith and Virmani, ; Manning, ; Weyers et al., ; Pyc&#;, ; Montes et al., ; Venkatesan et al., ). The effectiveness of epoxy-coated steel bars was verified. However, some studies only considered the influence of environmental factors, ignoring the influence of construction quality, integrity of epoxy coating, and other factors, so the effect of epoxy coating could not be accurately analyzed.

Through the experiment and technical improvement, the protection performance of epoxy coating on steel bars has been continuously improved (Nguyen and Martin, ; Singh and Ghosh, ; Selvaraj et al., ; Caldona et al., ). By changing the material and structure of the coating, the integrality performance of the reinforced concrete structure which is composed of epoxy-coated steel bars, and concrete has been verified and improved (Kim and Andrawes, ; Zhang et al., ; Shang et al., ). Epoxy coating can provide protection for steel bars even in the case of poor concrete quality (Darwin and Scantlebury, ). The corrosion protection of steel bars depends on the integrity of the epoxy coating, and its protection is always suspected once the epoxy coating is damaged (Manning, ; Darwin and Scantlebury, ; Kobayashi and Takewaka, ; Bautista and González, ; Gowripalan and Mohamed, ; Bellezze et al., ; Erdog˘du et al., ). The damage of epoxy coating may be caused by many reasons, such as bumping during construction and transportation, structural deformation, damage during use, and chemical reaction with surrounding substances (Wang et al., ; Wang and Gao, ; Zhao et al., ). Corrosion may not occur in the short term due to the alkaline environmental protection provided by concrete (Bellezze et al., ), but its long-term performance may have a great impact (Elleithy et al., ).

In this study, the corrosion electrochemical characteristics of epoxy rebars with damaged surface coating are studied. In order to speed up the process of the experiment, the impressed current (IC) technique was used to accelerate the corrosion of steel bsar (Li et al., ). Six epoxy-coated rebar specimens were manufactured with different degrees of breakage and placed in NaCl solution to simulate corrosion under the marine environment. The corrosion of epoxy-coated rebars was tested using the linear polarization method. According to the obtained electrochemical parameters, the corrosion of steel bars was quantitatively analyzed, and the influence of coating damage on steel bar corrosion could be obtained. The research results of this study could provide theoretical support for the application of epoxy-coated steel bars under the marine environment.

Experimental Design

Specimen Design

In this experiment, the influence of different damage degrees of epoxy coating on steel bars corrosion was mainly considered. Therefore, three groups of concrete blocks containing epoxy-coated steel bars with different damage levels were designed. Table 1 summarizes the design parameter details of the tested epoxy-coated steel bars and blocks.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Parameters of test block.

The epoxy-coated steel bar was an HRB400 steel bar with a diameter of 20 mm. The specimen of steel bar was cut to 26 mm in length. The epoxy coating was a Valspar product. After blending the coating and curing agent in a ratio of 5:1, epoxy was evenly coated on the surface of the steel bar. To simulate the damage of the epoxy rebar, part of the coating from the surface of the steel bar was removed with a file (Figure 1). The protective layer positioning frame was secured to the steel bar, and the uncoated end of the steel bar was attached to the die in order to connect the wires (Figure 2). After connecting the wire, the exposed steel bar at the end was sealed with epoxy adhesive.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Epoxy-coated steel bar specimen. (A) Steel bar coated with epoxy. (B) Damaged epoxy-coated steel bar.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Layout of epoxy-coated steel bar.

Experimental Apparatus

The experimental apparatus was mainly composed of four parts, as shown in Figure 3.

(1) Current stable supply: This part was mainly composed of single-channel adjustable DC power supply and external wire.

(2) Switch box (Figure 4): The constant current power supply and the CS354 electrochemical workstation were connected to the switch box through a socket, so the test process could be controlled through the switch. By flipping the switch on the switch box, the corrosion of the steel bar could be accelerated, and the electrochemical information such as resistance and potential of the steel bar in the sample could be measured. By using this equipment, the artificial test error caused by multiple measurements was reduced.

(3) The CS354 electrochemical workstation: This part was mainly composed of workstations and external wires. The CS354 electrochemical workstation could complete electrodynamic potential or dynamic current scanning, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and other electrochemical testing functions, which could meet the requirements of this test (Guan, ).

(4) Specimen test box: This part was composed of concrete test blocks, saturated calomel electrode, Pt/Ti electrode, NaCl solution, platinum cathode electrode, and conductors. Concrete test blocks were padded with wooden blocks and shelved in test boxes. A certain amount of NaCl solution was poured into the test box, and the reference electrode and platinum electrode were placed in NaCl solution. NaCl solution was used as a corrosion medium to simulate the marine environment.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Schematic diagram of the experimental device.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Switch box. (A) Surface of the switch box. (B) Inside of the switch box.

Experimental Process

Due to the protection of concrete and epoxy coating, the corrosion rate of the steel bar under natural conditions is slow. In order to speed up the process of the experiment, the electrochemical accelerated corrosion method was used to accelerate the corrosion rate of the steel bar. In order to avoid the obvious error between the corrosion caused by accelerated corrosion and the corrosion results produced in the natural environment due to excessive current density, the recommended critical value of μA/cm2 was used in this experiment (Wu, ; Feng et al., ). The steel bar in each concrete test block was connected to the switch box in parallel. It was calculated that the current provided to the steel bar block should be about 28.84 mA, so the output current of this experiment was set to 30 mA.

The current stable supply was connected to the switch box, and then the power supply was switched on to start galvanizing corrosion and control the galvanizing time and current size, as shown in Figure 5. The polarization curves were measured in different time periods, and the corrosion rates of steel bars at the damaged parts of the coating were calculated.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. Accelerated corrosion method and measurement of electric polarization parameter.

Result and Discussion

Analysis of Polarization Curve

After accelerated corrosion of each test block, the polarization curves of the specimens at different times were measured and plotted, as shown in Figure 6. As can be seen from the polarization curve in Figure 6A, the polarization curve slope of the epoxy steel bar with no surface damage in the test block after electrochemical accelerated corrosion is very large, without typical polarization curve characteristics, showing obvious low corrosion characteristics. In Figure 6B, after accelerated corrosion lasts for 30 days, corrosion current appears in the circuit, indicating that corrosion begins to occur in the epoxy steel bar. The cause may be slight damage to the epoxy coating when assembling the specimen or pouring the concrete, resulting in a weak current in the circuit.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. Polarization curves of different specimens (A) S1, (B) S4, (C) S2, (D) S5, (E) S3, and (F) S6.

As can be seen from the polarization curves in Figure 6C, the steel bars show obvious corrosion characteristics. With the development of corrosion, the polarization curves gradually move to the lower right direction, that is, the corrosion rate (Icorr) increases and the corrosion potential (Ecorr) decreases. Since the damage length of coating is relatively small, the change in polarization current in the system has a greater impact on corrosion. As can be seen from Figure 6D, compared with the electrolyte solution of 0.1 mol/L, the polarization curve of the anode rises faster. The increase in electrolyte concentration promotes the corrosion of steel bars, accelerates the activation state of epoxy steel bars with damaged surfaces in concrete specimens, and accelerates the corrosion reaction.

Figure 6F shows the polarization curve of the steel bar at different corrosion times when the concentration of NaCl solution is 1 mol/L, and the surface coating is damaged by 4 cm. Compared with the case of coating damage of 2 cm under the same other conditions, the increase in the anodic polarization curve in this part is slower, indicating that the self-corrosion current (Icorr) is higher and the self-corrosion potential (Ecorr) is lower after changing this parameter.

The polarization curve of the epoxy steel bar varies according to the degree of corrosion. Generally speaking, if the electrode is polarized from the cathode to the anode, the equilibrium potential of the polarization curve will move in the negative direction. If the steel bar is passivated, the offset increases significantly. As shown in Figure 6, the cathode polarization curves are very stable on the third day. However, the anode polarization curves rise rapidly, and the Tafel slope is very large. The anode reaction process is very difficult. Based on the principle of corrosion potential, it can be known that the steel bar in the damaged area of the coating may be passivated.

With the development of corrosion, the range of negative and anode zone becomes smaller, indicating that the passivation state of the steel bar is not stable. The aforementioned phenomenon shows that the pitting resistance of epoxy-coated steel bars is getting weaker. It can be seen from Figure 6E that the partial area of the anode showed fluctuations, which may be due to the micro-cracks on the surface of the epoxy-coated steel bar and then re-passivation. Then the passivation layer broke again under the action of the corrosion solution, resulting in the fluctuation of the corrosion current.

After 30 days of accelerated corrosion, the polarization curve of the anode becomes more stable and βa becomes smaller. It can be seen that the reaction of the anode is good, and the steel bar at the damaged site is highly involved in the reaction.

As can be seen from the characteristics of the polarization curve, the steel bar appears passivated on the third day, while the passivation film gradually disappears on the seventh day. With the concentration of NaCl solution is 1 mol/L, βa of the anodic curve of the steel bar with damaged surface coating goes to infinity on the third day of corrosion, indicating that a dense passivation layer has been formed on the surface. At this time, the polarization current is mainly controlled by the cathode reaction.

Corrosion Potential

Figures 6A,B show the corrosion potential Ecorr of the epoxy steel bar without surface damage maintained at about 0.25 mV after the accelerated corrosion test. It shows that the probability of steel bar corrosion is low. For epoxy steel bars without surface damage, 30 days of accelerated corrosion do not increase the risk of corrosion. For damaged steel bars, according to the change in corrosion potential, it can be seen that the corrosion of steel bars has been developing, and the corrosion potential continues to decrease.

By comparing the corrosion potential in different concentrations of the solution, it can be seen that the higher the concentration of the solution, the greater the negative value of corrosion potential. In addition, at the same electrolyte concentration, the greater the damage degree of epoxy coating, the faster will be the corrosion rate.

The disturbance of the electrode is excluded, and the effect of the ion diffusion rate on the electrode reaction is considered. With the progress of corrosion, Cl&#; in the coat-damaged area of the steel bar gradually accumulates, and the reaction rate of the anode area is faster and faster. When the O2 diffusion rate of the anode region is less than the corrosion reaction rate, the reaction rate of the anode is mainly determined by the O2 diffusion rate.

It can be seen from Figures 6D,F that the equilibrium potential increases on the third day, and the polarization curve of the anode region changes faster than that of the cathode region. The reason may be that the corrosion reaction is under O2 diffusion control, which leads to a decrease in the corrosion current density, thus slowing down the anodic polarization rate and making the slope of the anodic polarization curve large.

Polarization Resistance

Thirty days of accelerated corrosion tests were carried out on coated steel specimens, and the experimental data of 1st, 3rd, 7th, 15th, and 30th days were recorded. After testing by electrochemical workstation, the polarization resistance of each steel bar is obtained by fitting, as shown in Figures 7, 8. Under the condition that the concentration of NaCl solution is 0.1 mol/L and the surface coating is damaged 2 cm, the anodic polarization resistance of the steel specimens at different times is 238,760, 215,580, 71,626, 62,408, and 35,757 Ω cm2. The polarization resistance of epoxy steel bars after accelerated corrosion has decreased much, indicating that the reaction rate of the steel bar surface has largely increased. As the corrosion continues, the polarization resistance becomes smaller and smaller, and the corrosion rate becomes higher and higher. By comparing the polarization resistance values of 1 mol/L NaCl solution, it can be seen that the duration of acceleration has a great influence on the corrosion effect, while the difference in polarization resistance values at the same time is small.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7. Fitted polarization resistance of S2 and S5 at different times (A) 1d, (B) 3d, (C) 7d, (D) 15d, and (E) 30d.

FIGURE 8

FIGURE 8. Fitted polarization resistance of S3 and S6 at different times (A) 1d, (B) 3d, (C) 7d, (D) 15d, and (E) 30d.

Compared with the 0.1 mol/L concentration group, the polarization resistance value of concrete specimens after accelerated corrosion is reduced twice, indicating that the increase in NaCl solution concentration promotes corrosion. However, for 1 mol/L NaCl solution, there will be a sudden increase in polarization resistance on the third day, indicating that a passivation layer is produced on the steel bar at this time and then the passivation layer slowly disappears in a longer corrosion time.

By comparing the polarization resistance value of epoxy coating damaged 2 and 4 cm, it can be seen that the polarization resistance value of steel bars damaged 4 cm is lower after the accelerated corrosion at the same time, indicating that the larger the coating damage, the faster will be the corrosion.

It is found that polarization resistance measured by the electrochemical workstation can be affected by potential deviation, and it is difficult to determine the error value. Therefore, the mean value data of the specimen with 1 mol/L NaCl solution and 4-cm damaged surface coat are selected as the research object. A section of polarization curve near Ei =0 and Ecorr is selected. First, the polarization curve is fitted, and then the tangent lines corresponding to Ei =0 and Ecorr are drawn, respectively (Figure 9). It can be found that the slope (polarization resistance) is different. We suspect that actual polarization resistance may lie somewhere between these two curves.

FIGURE 9

FIGURE 9. Polarization curves of feature points.

It is difficult to calculate the exact value of the polarization resistance, and Rp can be modified by the following formula to obtain a more realistic value:

Rp=Rp&#;+Rp&#;2,(1)

For more Epoxy Coated Steel Strand wholesaleinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.

Rp&#;=(&#;ΔE&#;I)E=Ecorr,dE/dt&#;0.(3)

The corrosion potential changes and corresponding polarization resistance values of epoxy steel bars at different scanning rates were measured and obtained and are given in Table 2. As the scanning speed decreases, the Rρ'/ Rρ'' value gradually approaches 1, and when the scanning speed decreases to 0.10 mV/s, Rρ'/Rρ'' = 0.90 shows that the value of Rρ' and Rρ'' is very close.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2. Effect of scanning rate on potential offset.

Corrosion Current Density

The corrosion current and current density of each test block were recorded at days 1, 3, 7, 15, and 30, and the current density diagram is drawn as shown in Figure 10. Compared with the initial corrosion current density of epoxy steel bars, the corrosion current density sometimes decreases after accelerated corrosion. This may be due to the passivation of the surface of steel bars during the electrification process of accelerated corrosion, leading to a decrease in the polarization area, so the reaction shows a slight decrease in the corrosion current density. By comparing the current density of the 2-cm group and 4-cm group corroded by epoxy steel bar coating in electrolytes with different concentrations, it can be seen that the difference in corrosion current density between the two groups becomes larger and larger after accelerated corrosion, indicating that the concentration of electrolyte solution plays a dominant role in the later stage of corrosion.

FIGURE 10

FIGURE 10. Corrosion current density (A) S1 and S4; (B) S2 and S5; (C) S3 and S6.

Calculation of Corrosion Rate

The corrosion rate is calculated according to the following equation:

MPY=icorr×n×393.7×365×24×ρ×,(4)

where MPY is the corrosion rate (mil/a), n is the relative atomic mass, ρ is the density of iron, and icorr is the corrosion current density, which is calculated from the measured corrosion current. Through fitting calculation, the corrosion rate of steel bars under different corrosion durations, electrolyte solution concentrations, and coating damage degrees can be obtained (Table 3).

TABLE 3

TABLE 3. Analysis of the anode polarization curve.

Comparing these three groups of independent variables, it is found that in the case of coating damage, the accelerated corrosion duration is the primary influencing factor in this experiment. In contrast, the concentration of the solution has a greater effect on the corrosion rate than the damaged area of the coating in this experiment.

Through the analysis of experimental data, the corrosion curves of steel bars under different corrosion areas and Cl&#; concentration are fitted, and then the numerical relationship between corrosion quantity and corrosion time is obtained by curve fitting (Figure 11).

FIGURE 11

FIGURE 11. Fitting curve of corrosion quantity (A) S2, (B) S5, (C) S3, and (D) S6.

As can be seen from Figure 11, after local corrosion of steel bars, the higher Cl&#; concentration, the will be the second derivative of the corrosion curve, indicating that when the coated steel bars are damaged, the Cl&#; concentration will have a greater influence on the long-term corrosion of steel bars. For the corrosion of 2- and 4-cm coatings, the corrosion rate of steel bars at 4 cm is almost twice as high as that at 2 cm.

Conclusion

Based on the linear polarization theory principle, the electrochemical behavior of damaged epoxy-coated steel bars was analyzed using an accelerated corrosion test. The effects of the accelerated corrosion duration and electrolyte solution concentration on steel bar corrosion were analyzed through the check experiment. Finally, the following conclusions were drawn:

(1) When the epoxy coating is not damaged, the polarization curve is chaotic and there is no obvious electrochemical reaction characteristic. When the coating is damaged, the polarization curve has obvious change characteristics, through which the electrochemical reaction can be judged.

(2) With different solution concentrations, the development process of steel bar corrosion is different. In the early stage of the corrosion reaction, the slope of the anode polarization curve of the steel bar in 1 mol/L electrolyte may be very large. The reason is the difficulty of electrochemical reaction caused by electrode passivation. In the long term, the development trend of corrosion is that the corrosion rate increases and the corrosion potential decreases.

(3) According to the polarization curve near the characteristic points, the true value of the polarization resistance needs to be corrected. The polarization resistance calculated by the modified formula is closer to the real value.

(4) According to the corrosion current density and the corrosion rate of steel bar, the higher the electrolyte solution concentration, the larger will be the damaged area of the coating and the faster will be the reaction. In comparison, the concentration of the electrolyte has a greater effect on corrosion.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author Contributions

HC worked on the conception and design of this study, and derived relevant formulas. WD analyzed the data and charted it. ZL and ZZ made important revisions to the manuscript. WG and YW participated in the writing and revision of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the major special science and technology project (B) of &#;Ningbo science and technology innovation &#; and the scientific research project () of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Transportation.

Conflict of Interest

WD was employed by the China Highway Engineering Consulting Corporation Road and Bridge Design and Research Institute Branch.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher&#;s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Atilgan, A., Yurdakul, Ş., Erdogdu, Y., and Güllüoğlu, M. T. (). DFT Simulation, Quantum Chemical Electronic Structure, Spectroscopic and Structure-Activity Investigations of 4-acetylpyridine. J. Mol. Struct. , 55&#;65. doi:10./j.molstruc..01.080